From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KV5iZ-0005c6-Qd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:28:23 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KV5iY-0005bu-Ti for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:28:22 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44008 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KV5iY-0005bn-Gt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:28:22 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f19.google.com ([209.85.217.19]:63949) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KV5iY-0006vx-9M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:28:22 -0400 Received: by gxk12 with SMTP id 12so3517621gxk.10 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:28:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48A986DB.6050901@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:27:39 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Breakage with local APIC routing References: <48A860AC.1010307@mail.berlios.de> <20080817202358.GA7731@hall.aurel32.net> <48A893B9.5020700@mail.berlios.de> In-Reply-To: <48A893B9.5020700@mail.berlios.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Stefan Weil wrote: > Aurelien Jarno schrieb: > >> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 07:32:28PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote: >> >> >>> See also http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/24739. >>> EFI BIOS is affected by the same problem. >>> >> With the difference that the patch proposed in this thread actually >> fixes the problem in case of the EFI BIOS. >> >> > > Great. So that patch improves Qemu and should be applied to trunk? > If someone resubmits the patch, it will be reviewed and applied if appropriate. I couldn't find the referenced patch (not sure which thread it's a part of). In general, I don't like applying patches that are deep within a thread because it's hard to determine whether there was an updated patch somewhere else in the thread and it's even more difficult to identify which messages in the thread may contain a patch. Top-level postings with a clear indication of which version of the patch (v2, v3, v4, etc.) and an indication of whether it's a resubmission (via [RESEND]) makes it much easier to find the right patch to apply. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Stefan > > > >