From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KV5mY-0007Ng-Ed for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:32:30 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KV5mV-0007Lm-Fi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:32:29 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53917 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KV5mV-0007Lj-CV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:32:27 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.177]:30021) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KV5mU-0008Nt-Qg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:32:27 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p76so1645153pyb.10 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:32:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48A987CC.4040908@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:31:40 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] [x86] Add Core 2 Duo CPU specification References: <48A01655.3060604@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <48A01655.3060604@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Alexander Graf Alexander Graf wrote: > Hi, > > this set of patches attempts to implement a CPU definition set for > current Intel CPUs that resembles an original as closely as currently > possible. Several features a current Intel CPU has are not implemented > by qemu, but that should not keep us from adding this definition so > people can add features later on. > > As a side effect, I made the sysenter instruction 64-bit aware. This > was an issue in KVM, that used the 32-bit cpu struct variables to hold > 64-bit MSR values sysenter needs. I believe it to be a step in the > right direction to not fix this only for KVM, but make the > functionality available to qemu as well. Does anyone have any objections to this series? I see no obvious flaws and it looks to be quite self contained. My understanding is that this is needed to enable OS X guest support so it seems worthwhile to apply to me. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Alex > >