From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KWF9R-00029y-L9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:44:53 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KWF9Q-00029d-5a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:44:53 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34771 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KWF9P-00029S-Uo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:44:51 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.236]:12869) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KWF9P-00064e-Qg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:44:51 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c46so125558wra.18 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:44:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48ADB776.7010905@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:44:06 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <48A98102.10904@codemonkey.ws> <48A9C630.30108@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <48A9C630.30108@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/8] Various USB fixes and improvements (update 2) Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Krasnyansky Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paul Brook Max Krasnyansky wrote: > Anthony Liguori wrote: >> Any objections to applying this series? It seems like the consensus >> is that OHCI support is better long term but this series seems pretty >> sane and self-contained. > > I'm actually having seconds thought on the OHCI vs UHCI. You probably > saw my reply to Paul. New UHCI code is fairly clean and simple, and is > working well. But I definitely think that we should fix OHCI too, and > at some point we need to add EHCI (ie USB 2.0 stuff). > > I have more patches coming. I made isoc transactions work on Friday > which made MS VX-3000 USB camera totally usable (will send a patch in > a couple of hours). And I'm working on making control transactions > async too which should shave off last bits of bad latency > (2-3milliseconds) from the USB code. Initially I thought control stuff > is not very frequent but this stupid USB webcam drivers does one very > often. > So yeah, it be nice if this stuff is merged soonish :). > > btw If you're using git as a front end to the SVN I can push my git > tree somewhere to kernel.org so that you can just pull the whole thing. Yes, please do for the future. Regards, Anthony Liguori