From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KXcqo-0001sR-2G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:15:22 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KXcqm-0001ri-O8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:15:21 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49518 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KXcqm-0001rS-IJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:15:20 -0400 Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com ([72.14.246.245]:52770) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KXcqm-0007u4-7L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:15:20 -0400 Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 31so4511200agc.5 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 07:15:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48B2BE4A.70100@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:14:34 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Re : [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Make vmport an optional feature at run time. References: <828495.95119.qm@web24503.mail.ird.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <828495.95119.qm@web24503.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Sylvain Petreolle wrote: > ----- Message d'origine ---- > > Apart ESXi, there are software that behave differently if they detect a virtual environment. > Some of them completely refuse to work. > What software detects the VMware backdoor and refuses to work? It's silly to argue anything but specifics. It's sufficient easy to detect that guest software is running under QEMU as it is regardless of vmport. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Regards, > > Sylvain Petreolle > > > >