From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KXcsL-0002UI-M3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:16:57 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KXcsK-0002Tx-Ov for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:16:57 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53176 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KXcsK-0002Tq-KW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:16:56 -0400 Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com ([72.14.246.248]:54646) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KXcsC-0008L0-JG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:16:56 -0400 Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 31so4512724agc.5 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 07:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48B2BE9E.3080905@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:15:58 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xenner: add event channel implementation. References: <1219400728-20422-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <1219400728-20422-2-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <48AEC328.6040502@codemonkey.ws> <48AED58C.5020206@redhat.com> <48B2AC79.7040002@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <48B2AC79.7040002@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > > Comments on this one? > > Another idea: Do the initial merge in hw/, and later on, after the > qemu-xen tree catched up, move all xen (and xen emulation) bits to > another directory. That would keep the scm revision history intact for > the Xen guys. > > I also think we need to organize the source -- especially the header > files -- a bit better if we start to separate the code into more > subdirectories. And I'd prefer to have some agreement on how the source > tree should look like before starting to shuffle around files, so I have > to do it only once ... > Let's focus on merging and then once it's merged, we can reorganize files. I still haven't seen any comments from the Xen guys wrt this patch series. Has there been discussion on xen-devel that I missed? Regards, Anthony Liguori > cheers, > Gerd >