From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KXgKJ-00082A-0e
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:58:03 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KXgKH-00081w-Nq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:58:02 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55869 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KXgKH-00081t-Kw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:58:01 -0400
Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com ([72.14.246.250]:35738)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1KXgKH-0007FH-OG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:58:01 -0400
Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 31so4738004agc.5
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <48B2F27B.5010200@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:57:15 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xenner: add event channel
	implementation.
References: <C4D88A5F.1C73C%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
In-Reply-To: <C4D88A5F.1C73C%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi Keir,

Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 25/8/08 15:15, "Anthony Liguori" <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
>
> With regard to this Xenner patch series, I don't think we have a strong
> opinion. The changes are not particularly relevant to us. As long as the
> orthogonal qemu-on-xen modes that we *do* care about can coexist happily
> alongside, we'll be happy.
>   

Sorry, I was actually referring to the other qemu-dm PV domain support 
patch series.  That's the one that I'm looking for input from ya'll on.  
Now that 3.3.0 has been released, it should be possible for you guys to 
consider merging the patches into qemu-dm, right?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>  -- Keir
>
>
>