From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KY1ap-0001wd-5Q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:40:31 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KY1am-0001tO-3k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:40:30 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60952 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KY1al-0001tC-TE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:40:27 -0400
Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com ([72.14.246.241]:12114)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1KY1al-0007Hm-OO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:40:27 -0400
Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 31so5763927agc.5
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <48B431CD.5020706@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:39:41 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/13] Handle terminating
	signals.
References: <1219336054-15919-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>	<18612.9061.534326.657959@mariner.uk.xensource.com>	<48B42B57.2070301@qumranet.com>
	<200808261814.57044.jseward@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <200808261814.57044.jseward@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>

Julian Seward wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 August 2008, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>   
>> Threading bugs in the implementation?  In 2008?
>>
>> Practically all serious software is multithreaded nowadays.
>>     
>
> That's not in itself an argument in support of writing threaded code
> if you don't have to.
>   

I know arguing about threading is almost as fun as arguing about XML, 
but in this very specific, very particular case, it's pretty obvious by 
simple inspection that there aren't thread safety issues.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori