From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KY4B3-0006yZ-31 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:26:05 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KY4B2-0006xx-AX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:26:04 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56804 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KY4B1-0006xg-Pd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:26:03 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:39311) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KY4B1-0005wi-3F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:26:03 -0400 Message-ID: <48B45855.1000301@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:24:05 +0200 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/13] xen: groundwork for xen support References: <18611.56211.660082.627144@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20080826125742.GB19615@redhat.com> <48B40306.2080104@redhat.com> <20080826132309.GC19615@redhat.com> <18612.1557.455011.713070@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20080826141400.GE19615@redhat.com> <48B413D5.3080203@redhat.com> <20080826144056.GG19615@redhat.com> <48B417E1.6090709@redhat.com> <20080826145342.GH19615@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20080826145342.GH19615@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:49:05PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> But when running on xen we want being able to qemu tell it should *not* >> use the xen hypervisor but emulate things, thus -xen-emulate. > > Oh, i see what you mean. Existing naming practice would suggest naming > it -no-xenhv or just -no-xen Well, as you are going to run a xen guest -no-xen wouldn't be very intuitive IMHO. -no-xenhv is only slightly better. > All these '-no-XXX' args are getting a little silly though. I'd rather > tell QEMU what I *do* want, than what I don't want. A generic arg > '-accelerator none|xen|kvm|kqemu' might be worth considering in the future. Agreed. cheers, Gerd