From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kb4zZ-0007Q3-Ky for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 22:54:41 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kb4zY-0007Pm-5B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 22:54:41 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45794 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kb4zX-0007Pj-Ve for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 22:54:40 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f23.google.com ([209.85.217.23]:63937) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kb4zX-0006lM-PD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 22:54:39 -0400 Received: by gxk4 with SMTP id 4so2795523gxk.10 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:54:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48BF4DBE.6040206@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:53:50 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Xen patches - status summary References: <18621.28008.90183.80897@mariner.uk.xensource.com> In-Reply-To: <18621.28008.90183.80897@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Ian Jackson wrote > [3] Re: IDE error checking > > I summarised the discussion in my message `[REPOST] [PATCH 0/2]'. > There has been no recent response. For the reasons I explain, I think > this patch should be applied now without waiting for any > ENOSPC-auto-pause feature. For the vast majority of users, ENOSPC is the only realistic error that will occur. I don't think a patch that doesn't handle ENOSPC in a sane way is really that useful. > [4] Re: IDE write cache > I have to review these patches but I do agree with the theory behind them. Regards, Anthony Liguori