From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KbZ5E-0005At-LD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:02:32 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KbZ5C-0005A5-V5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:02:32 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55521 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KbZ5C-00059q-HY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:02:30 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50503 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@suse.de>) id 1KbZ5C-0004V9-KY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:02:30 -0400
Received: from Relay1.suse.de (relay-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8109C45F21
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri,  5 Sep 2008 13:02:27 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <48C111C6.10902@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:02:30 +0200
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] bug reading word straddling page boundary
References: <48BFB9B8020000480005B49C@lucius.provo.novell.com>
In-Reply-To: <48BFB9B8020000480005B49C@lucius.provo.novell.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Bruce Rogers <BROGERS@novell.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi Bruce,

have you tried pure qemu? I can reproduce this on the qemu from my
installed KVM (which is kvm-70), but not on pure qemu. I used both SVN
HEAD and SVN Rev 5008 for the test and they both worked. The latter
should be older than the kvm-73 release, so this seems to be introduced
by KVM (or they were lucky enough to pull a bad version in between).

The "only" bad thing I noticed during my test is that the i386 userspace
emulator immediately segfaults...

Kevin