From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KcALg-0004Dr-U6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:50:01 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KcALe-0004Cj-VK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:50:00 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36072 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KcALe-0004Cd-Hn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:49:58 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.250]:56803) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KcALd-0003UQ-Qe for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:49:58 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d18so163401and.130 for ; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:49:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48C34123.5030201@codemonkey.ws> Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:49:07 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND] wrap up use of dangerous ctype.h macros References: <18364.21555.874570.784725@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <18614.56999.66982.389605@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <48B708F1.9080300@codemonkey.ws> <18615.50309.943540.583772@mariner.uk.xensource.com> In-Reply-To: <18615.50309.943540.583772@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Ian Jackson wrote: > Anthony Liguori writes ("Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND] wrap up use of dangerous ctype.h macros"): > >> Can't we just have qemu_isspace() macros? I find the CTYPE macro quite >> awkward. I don't think most people are comfortable with that kind of >> syntax. >> > > I don't have a strong opinion about this. But of course qemu_isspace > et al would require us to list in qemu-common.h all of the isfoobar > and towombat functions. > At least, the ones we actually use. I'd definitely prefer this. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Ian. > > >