Re: [Qemu-devel] Xen patches - status summary

[Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>]

Ian Jackson wrote:
> Anthony Liguori writes ("Re: [Qemu-devel] Xen patches - status summary"):
>
> I think the rule should generally be that a patch should be applied if
> it (a) makes some improvement, no matter how minor and (b) does not
> make any future desirable restructuring harder.  The fact that a
> restructuring is desirable does not mean that minor improvements
> should be blocked in the meantime.
>   

There's a balance between band-aid fixing and making forward progress in 
improving things.  Honestly, you've spent more time writing emails 
trying to avoid adding special handling for ENOSPC than it would have 
taken to just update the original patch.

Reporting an IDE error on ENOSPC is just plain wrong.  It doesn't matter 
if already broken and you're just changing how it's broken.  It's not 
like it's a massive effort to update the patch.  I'll eventually get to 
it myself but it's a whole lot easier for you to just do it and then we 
can move on to more important things :-)

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Ian.
>
>
>