From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kcavy-0002Uk-2p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:13:14 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kcavv-0002UY-Ir for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:13:12 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43167 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kcavv-0002UV-E9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:13:11 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:41980) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kcavu-0003fE-VE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:13:11 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kcavu-0005pL-1E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:13:10 -0400 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m887CNhH022740 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 03:12:43 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m887CBBw006961 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 03:12:12 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn-12-6.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.6]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m887CAHR003066 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 03:12:11 -0400 Message-ID: <48C4CF9E.5070106@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:09:18 +0200 From: Chris Lalancette MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug with TARGET_PHYS_ADDR_SPACE_BITS References: <48AB070A.1040104@redhat.com> <20080820061558.GB17273@volta.aurel32.net> <48AD801D.5090308@redhat.com> <48C33977.8070206@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <48C33977.8070206@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Anthony Liguori wrote: > qemu is really qemu-system-i386 just unfortunately named. This define > will differ in the qemu vs qemu-system-x86_64 binaries. > > Has there been any resolution here? Yes, see Glauber's post: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2008-09/msg00076.html and the resulting discussion. Chris Lalancette