From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Kcdz5-0000vA-Qx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:28:39 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Kcdz3-0000rD-AF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:28:39 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40722 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kcdz2-0000qX-Qa
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:28:36 -0400
Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:12397)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>)
	id 1Kcdz1-0003u9-SQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:28:36 -0400
Message-ID: <48C4FEB1.3060109@eu.citrix.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:30:09 +0100
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] opengl rendering in the sdl window
References: <48B81423.9050502@eu.citrix.com>
	<48BF4F4F.40208@codemonkey.ws>	<48BFB318.206@eu.citrix.com>
	<20080905120214.GD1373@shareable.org>	<48C16207.5090808@eu.citrix.com>	<20080905165536.GA12606@redhat.com>
	<48C38757.5030507@qumranet.com>	<20080907115735.GA12055@redhat.com>
	<48C3D334.40408@qumranet.com>
In-Reply-To: <48C3D334.40408@qumranet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

I completely agree with Avi: Opengl has been around since 1992, and now
you tell me that it is better not to use it because it breaks Compiz?!
To say the least it would be a bad long term engineering decision.

Avi Kivity wrote:

>> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> The distros can't do anything about it, until X driver architecture work
>> is done.
>>
> 
> The distros can avoid shipping compiz until it is resolved one way or
> another.  Are wobbly windows worth breaking applications?
> 
>> This is exactly why Fedora does not yet enable compiz by default. Many
>> users still enable it though.
>>   
> 
> Ah, okay then.  The gui should probably say something about voiding the
> warranty, etc.
>