From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4 of 5] sdl shared buffer support
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:31:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48C5372F.9080903@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48C5349D.60707@eu.citrix.com>
Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>
>> Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>
>>> This patch implements shared buffer support in sdl.c.
>>> It also supports paletted 8 bit colour depths using the
>>> palette functions provided by the SDL library.
>>>
>>>
>> So the theory goes that it's possible with this patch that both surfaces
>> are hardware surfaces so blitting is fast?
>>
>
>
> The theory goes that SDL blitting and color conversion functions should
> be as optimized as you can get, and hardware accelerated if your card
> supports it.
> Besides I think that offloading blitting and color conversion to a
> graphic library is a good idea.
>
It requires two paths in the code to handle the case where the backend
can't handle conversion itself. If we're not getting any sort of
benefit from offloading, then I don't see the need for increased code
complexity.
>> In practice, when using X11
>> both surfaces are going to be XShmImages so I don't think this is going
>> to perform any better than the current code.
>>
>
> Only the guest framebuffer derived surface is always a software surface,
> the host window can be an hardware surface (as far as I know).
>
Not when using SDL on X11. It will use an XShmImage if possible,
otherwise falling back to a normal XImage. There's really no other way
to do surfaces in X11 without using one of the extensions (like DGA).
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-08 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-04 14:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4 of 5] sdl shared buffer support Stefano Stabellini
2008-09-08 0:48 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-09-08 14:20 ` Stefano Stabellini
2008-09-08 14:31 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48C5372F.9080903@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).