From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KdoxT-0003TJ-3f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:23:51 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KdoxQ-0003R8-Gw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:23:50 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57816 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KdoxQ-0003R0-8L
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:23:48 -0400
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.241]:52525)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1KdoxQ-00030k-0b
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:23:48 -0400
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d18so47190and.130
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:23:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <48C945DD.4020304@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:22:53 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/10] Live migration for QEMU
References: <1220989802-13706-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com>	<200809111213.m8BCDHaC012607@fjmscan502.ms.jp.fujitsu.com>	<48C917F3.7040507@codemonkey.ws>	<20080911133046.GE16427@shareable.org>
	<48C92742.8000002@us.ibm.com> <48C939F6.1070006@qumranet.com>
In-Reply-To: <48C939F6.1070006@qumranet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>, Uri Lublin <uri.lublin@qumranet.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org

Avi Kivity wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>> Yes.  The primary reason that hasn't been possible in the past was 
>> because of how memory was migrated.  The new memory migration 
>> protocol happens to make it easier to let QEMU and KVM be 
>> compatible.  That wasn't an accident :-)
>>
>
> Well, it's still broken IMO (migration ram_addr_t rather than physical 
> addresses).

Have you thought of a solution other than make "mem" only save physical 
memory and have everything else save their own memory?

That gets really funky because then everything needs live save/restore 
tracking.  It's quite messy.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori