From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KeDHE-0006cM-8h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:21:52 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KeDHD-0006bL-Hm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:21:51 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46112 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KeDHD-0006av-CD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:21:51 -0400 Received: from mailout.artfiles.de ([80.252.97.80]:51413) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KeDHD-00043O-Cz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:21:51 -0400 Received: from [77.128.85.108] (helo=bttr-software.de) auth=rr@bttr-software.de by mailout.artfiles.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) id 1KeDH8-0000bT-QR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:21:47 +0200 Message-ID: <48CAB333.99EFAA41@bttr-software.de> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:21:39 +0200 From: Robert Riebisch MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] FMOD library on Win32 References: <48CA8C45.40E956A6@bttr-software.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org malc wrote: > > Sorry for my stupid question, but what's the FMOD library for on Win32? > > What does it better than SDL or DirectSound? > > It was coded before DirectSound and for a while was the only way to > get decent audio quality on Windows. It might (or might not) work > better/faster than DSound with multiple hardware output channels. Thanks for clarifying! :-) Btw: Will QEMU also support some day? It claims to be *much* faster than SDL: Robert Riebisch -- BTTR Software http://www.bttr-software.de/