From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Keg8F-0003bf-SE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:10:31 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Keg8E-0003bC-6m
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:10:31 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45175 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Keg8E-0003b8-3X
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:10:30 -0400
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.237]:26136)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1Keg8D-00013y-7q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:10:29 -0400
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h27so646859wxd.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <48CC644E.8000304@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 20:09:34 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1221343245-24803-1-git-send-email-maxk@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1221343245-24803-1-git-send-email-maxk@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] husb: Make control transactions
	asynchronous (v2)
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@kernel.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, aurelien@aurel32.net, kvm@vger.kernel.org

Max Krasnyansky wrote:
> USB is 99.8% async now :). 0.2% is the three control requests that
> we need to execute synchronously. We could off-load that to a thread
> or something but it's not worth the pain since those requests are
> performed only during device initialization (ie when device is
> connected to the VM).
>
> The change is a bit bigger than I wanted due to the fact that generic
> handle_packet()/handle_control() interface was not designed for
> async transactions. So I ended up adding custom handle_packet()
> code to usb-linux. We can make that generic if/when some other
> component needs it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@kernel.org>
>   

Applied.  Thanks.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori