From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KfE2L-0007os-Ew
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:22:41 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KfE2J-0007ml-R6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:22:41 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45027 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KfE2J-0007me-NX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:22:39 -0400
Received: from gecko.sbs.de ([194.138.37.40]:21495)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>) id 1KfE2J-0002BN-Fz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:22:39 -0400
Message-ID: <48CE617F.1070702@siemens.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:22:07 +0200
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <486CF559.5090805@siemens.com>
	<48AC2E09.3030405@siemens.com>	<48AC2EE9.8050803@siemens.com>
	<48C33916.6010608@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <48C33916.6010608@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [RESEND][PATCH 2/13] Refactor and enhance
 break/watchpoint API
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Does anyone have any objections to this series?  It literally touches
> every architectures so I don't want to commit it without some Ack'ing
> for the appropriate architecture maintainers.

What's the latest status of this? Waiting for Paul's ack? Or is the
merge already scheduled for next free time slot?

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux