From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KfGSg-0003EM-0v
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:58:02 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KfGSd-0003D5-VM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:58:01 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50360 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KfGSd-0003Cz-OY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:57:59 -0400
Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.44.152]:19224)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1KfGSd-000674-QU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:57:59 -0400
Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 3so635650yxi.82
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <48CE85D1.6020109@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:57:05 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Make page_find() return 0 for too-large
	addresses
References: <20080912185856.GM3982@blackpad> <48CAC809.5000901@codemonkey.ws>
	<20080912201406.GA10147@blackpad> <20080912204404.GB10147@blackpad>
	<48CE7F4A.3060000@codemonkey.ws> <20080915154843.GC12539@blackpad>
In-Reply-To: <20080915154843.GC12539@blackpad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, gcosta@redhat.com

Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:29:14AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>   
>> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>     
> <snip>
>   
>>> New patch, reusing the range check from page_find_alloc() on
>>> page_find(). Untested.
>>>   
>>>       
>> Have you tested this patch yet?  I like to avoid being the first one to  
>> test something when it's not my code :-)
>>     
>
> I've tested it now, both with KVM enabled and with KVM disabled. My
> machine didn't explode yet, so it seems to be fine.  :)
>   

Applied.  Thanks.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori