From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kg4It-00014c-FI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:11:15 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kg4Is-00013Q-0D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:11:15 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=32835 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kg4Ir-00013J-Oi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:11:13 -0400 Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.170.189]:15114) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kg4Iq-0007dX-9Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:11:13 -0400 Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id m61so4211643rnd.8 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:11:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48D17237.1030200@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:10:15 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] "Will it blend?" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Ben Taylor wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: > >> On 9/17/08, Jonathan Kalbfeld wrote: >> >>> Would it even work on Sparc64/Solaris 10 any more? >>> >> Who knows? The only way is to try. >> > > qemu no longer compiles on Solaris 10 due to C99 issues in > nbd. It will compile on Solaris Express. > > adding c99 or gnuc99 also doesn't work because of > anonymous unions not being supported. > GCC on Solaris doesn't support anonymous unions? That seems bizarre. Or are you using the Sun compiler? Is it block-nbd or qemu-nbd that doesn't work? If it's the later, it's easy enough to prevent it from building on Solaris. Regards, Anthony Liguori