From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KiV5b-0001hZ-U9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:11:35 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KiV5Y-0001gH-2x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:11:35 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56609 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KiV5X-0001gC-S7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:11:31 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:51080) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KiV5W-00089B-RN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:11:31 -0400 Received: from d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.228]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8OEBM0D014329 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:11:22 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id m8OEBFxA175318 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:11:17 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m8OEBEvp001785 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:11:14 -0600 Message-ID: <48DA4A31.1070909@us.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:09:53 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <48DA02CC.9060802@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <48DA02CC.9060802@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [patch] 64 bit truncation in code_gen_buffer_size calculation Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jes Sorensen Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Jes Sorensen wrote: > Hi, > > This one is pretty obvious, don't truncate the result of > code_gen_buffer_size calculation to int when the target is an unsigned > long. Gives funny results when trying to boot something with a lot of > memory on a 64 bit system. Applied. Thanks. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Cheers, > Jes > > >