From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kkhqc-0001du-KE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:13:14 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kkhqa-0001cw-Qb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:13:14 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56573 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kkhqa-0001cq-LC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:13:12 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f19.google.com ([209.85.217.19]:37194) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kkhqa-0002XJ-7Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:13:12 -0400 Received: by gxk12 with SMTP id 12so12939124gxk.10 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:13:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48E24FD2.2010101@codemonkey.ws> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:12:02 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [5344] Implement a HCI passthrough to host. References: <48E10106.5060203@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Blue Swirl wrote: > On 9/30/08, andrzej zaborowski wrote: > >> 2008/9/29 Anthony Liguori : >> >> >>> Andrzej Zaborowski wrote: >>> >> >> >> >> Revision: 5344 >> >> http://svn.sv.gnu.org/viewvc/?view=rev&root=qemu&revision=5344 >> >> Author: balrog >> >> Date: 2008-09-28 23:49:55 +0000 (Sun, 28 Sep 2008) >> >> >> >> Log Message: >> >> ----------- >> >> Implement a HCI passthrough to host. >> >> >> >> This allows using a host's physical HCI as one of the HCIs attached >> >> to the virtual machine. This brings various limitations because not >> >> all commands/events are passed through by Linux kernel, some are >> >> interpreted by the host's kernel for a speed gain. >> >> >> > >> > This broke the Windows build. The whole file should probably be build >> > conditionally on CONFIG_BLUEZ. >> >> >> Is that because of uio.h? writev() seems to be posix. Does win32 >> have it under a different name? >> >> Added a stronger check for bluez, hopefully will cross-compile better now. >> > > You are still relying that the host pkg-config exists and gives > information that is valid for cross-compiling. > When cross compiling, you should set you PKG_CONFIG_PATH variable so that the appropriate set of pkg-config configs are found. Regards, Anthony Liguori