From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KmqL6-0006Yq-IB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 09:41:32 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KmqL4-0006Xs-Si for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 09:41:32 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51337 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KmqL4-0006Xm-I3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 09:41:30 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f19.google.com ([209.85.217.19]:51129) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KmqL4-0006uj-5I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 09:41:30 -0400 Received: by gxk12 with SMTP id 12so5473882gxk.10 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 06:41:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48EA1585.90804@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 08:41:25 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] USB over network References: <200810061309.10270.paul@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Gal Hammer wrote: >> Apart from anything else, it's missing documentation. >> > > I am aware of that. I'll document the work I've done so far and include > the open issues that you (and others) wrote. > > >> It looks like you have to start qemu with magic options on the remote >> machine? >> > > No, qemu should be started with "-usbremote host:port" command line > option. This will start a listener which wait for incoming remote > connections. The remote connection is established with the qemu-usbd > application. The qemu-usbd is executed on the local machine, the one > that the USB device is attached to. > I think it would be better to support a push instead of a pull model. For instance, something like: -usbdevice remote:host:port That connected to something that was listening on the machine that had the USB device. If you really wanted a server, I'd suggest a syntax like: -usbdevice remote:host:port,server So at a high level, what's functional now, and how much work is needed to be completely functional? Is there anything that isn't going to work because of fundamental issues? Regards, Anthony Liguori > Gal. > > > >