From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 04/13] Respect length of watchpoints
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:26:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48F4E45F.1060300@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80810141050p1de281e1r7738434b7127d638@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6228 bytes --]
Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:
>> This adds length support for watchpoints. To keep things simple, only
>> aligned watchpoints are accepted.
>
> why? It does not seem that much complicated to handle unaligned watchpoints.
> Unless I'm totally wrong, we should just store the value as-is, and
> then check for it.
> As a matter of fact, because we're masking and testing for the mask,
> it seems even more
> complicated to require that. I agree a full aligned world would be a
> happier world, but unfortunately,
> unaligned accesses are quite common in x86.
Unaligned watchpoints also means multi-page watchpoints - and this
introduces some complexity. I think the fact that real x86 hw
watchpoints require alignment as well motivated the simplification. But
if there is a real need for it (e.g. some other arch using the
infrastructure for hw watchpoint emulation), I could rethink this.
However, I would prefer to apply such extension on top of the proposed
implementation.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>> ---
>> cpu-defs.h | 2 +-
>> exec.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: b/exec.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- a/exec.c
>> +++ b/exec.c
>> @@ -1313,14 +1313,21 @@ static void breakpoint_invalidate(CPUSta
>> int cpu_watchpoint_insert(CPUState *env, target_ulong addr, target_ulong len,
>> int flags, CPUWatchpoint **watchpoint)
>> {
>> + target_ulong len_mask = ~(len - 1);
>> CPUWatchpoint *wp;
>>
>> + /* sanity checks: allow power-of-2 lengths, deny unaligned watchpoints */
>> + if ((len != 1 && len != 2 && len != 4 && len != 8) || (addr & ~len_mask)) {
>> + fprintf(stderr, "qemu: tried to set invalid watchpoint at "
>> + TARGET_FMT_lx ", len=" TARGET_FMT_lu "\n", addr, len);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> wp = qemu_malloc(sizeof(*wp));
>> if (!wp)
>> return -ENOBUFS;
>>
>> wp->vaddr = addr;
>> - wp->len = len;
>> + wp->len_mask = len_mask;
>> wp->flags = flags;
>>
>> wp->next = env->watchpoints;
>> @@ -1344,10 +1351,12 @@ int cpu_watchpoint_insert(CPUState *env,
>> int cpu_watchpoint_remove(CPUState *env, target_ulong addr, target_ulong len,
>> int flags)
>> {
>> + target_ulong len_mask = ~(len - 1);
>> CPUWatchpoint *wp;
>>
>> for (wp = env->watchpoints; wp != NULL; wp = wp->next) {
>> - if (addr == wp->vaddr && len == wp->len && flags == wp->flags) {
>> + if (addr == wp->vaddr && len_mask == wp->len_mask
>> + && flags == wp->flags) {
>> cpu_watchpoint_remove_by_ref(env, wp);
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -2502,7 +2511,7 @@ static CPUWriteMemoryFunc *notdirty_mem_
>> };
>>
>> /* Generate a debug exception if a watchpoint has been hit. */
>> -static void check_watchpoint(int offset, int flags)
>> +static void check_watchpoint(int offset, int len_mask, int flags)
>> {
>> CPUState *env = cpu_single_env;
>> target_ulong vaddr;
>> @@ -2510,7 +2519,8 @@ static void check_watchpoint(int offset,
>>
>> vaddr = (env->mem_io_vaddr & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) + offset;
>> for (wp = env->watchpoints; wp != NULL; wp = wp->next) {
>> - if (vaddr == wp->vaddr && (wp->flags & flags)) {
>> + if ((vaddr == (wp->vaddr & len_mask) ||
>> + (vaddr & wp->len_mask) == wp->vaddr) && (wp->flags & flags)) {
>> env->watchpoint_hit = wp;
>> cpu_interrupt(env, CPU_INTERRUPT_DEBUG);
>> break;
>> @@ -2523,40 +2533,40 @@ static void check_watchpoint(int offset,
>> phys routines. */
>> static uint32_t watch_mem_readb(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr)
>> {
>> - check_watchpoint(addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK, BP_MEM_READ);
>> + check_watchpoint(addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK, ~0x0, BP_MEM_READ);
>> return ldub_phys(addr);
>> }
>>
>> static uint32_t watch_mem_readw(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr)
>> {
>> - check_watchpoint(addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK, BP_MEM_READ);
>> + check_watchpoint(addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK, ~0x1, BP_MEM_READ);
>> return lduw_phys(addr);
>> }
>>
>> static uint32_t watch_mem_readl(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr)
>> {
>> - check_watchpoint(addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK, BP_MEM_READ);
>> + check_watchpoint(addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK, ~0x3, BP_MEM_READ);
>> return ldl_phys(addr);
>> }
>>
>> static void watch_mem_writeb(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr,
>> uint32_t val)
>> {
>> - check_watchpoint(addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK, BP_MEM_WRITE);
>> + check_watchpoint(addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK, ~0x0, BP_MEM_WRITE);
>> stb_phys(addr, val);
>> }
>>
>> static void watch_mem_writew(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr,
>> uint32_t val)
>> {
>> - check_watchpoint(addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK, BP_MEM_WRITE);
>> + check_watchpoint(addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK, ~0x1, BP_MEM_WRITE);
>> stw_phys(addr, val);
>> }
>>
>> static void watch_mem_writel(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr,
>> uint32_t val)
>> {
>> - check_watchpoint(addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK, BP_MEM_WRITE);
>> + check_watchpoint(addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK, ~0x3, BP_MEM_WRITE);
>> stl_phys(addr, val);
>> }
>>
>> Index: b/cpu-defs.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- a/cpu-defs.h
>> +++ b/cpu-defs.h
>> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ typedef struct CPUBreakpoint {
>>
>> typedef struct CPUWatchpoint {
>> target_ulong vaddr;
>> - target_ulong len;
>> + target_ulong len_mask;
>> int flags; /* BP_* */
>> struct CPUWatchpoint *prev, *next;
>> } CPUWatchpoint;
>
> It's less confusing if you call it len_mask from the beginning,
> instead of changing your own patch for that purpose.
OK. If I have to update the involved patches, I will merge this over.
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 257 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-14 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-14 9:12 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/13] Enhance debugging support - 3rd take Jan Kiszka
2008-10-14 9:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/13] Return appropriate watch message to gdb Jan Kiszka
2008-10-14 9:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/13] Refactor and enhance break/watchpoint API Jan Kiszka
2008-10-14 17:24 ` Glauber Costa
2008-10-14 17:45 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2008-10-14 17:51 ` Glauber Costa
2008-10-14 17:35 ` [Qemu-devel] " Glauber Costa
2008-10-14 17:53 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2008-10-14 9:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/13] Set mem_io_vaddr on io_read Jan Kiszka
2008-10-14 17:39 ` Glauber Costa
2008-10-14 17:49 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2008-10-14 9:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/13] Respect length of watchpoints Jan Kiszka
2008-10-14 17:50 ` Glauber Costa
2008-10-14 18:26 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2008-10-14 9:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/13] Introduce next_cflags Jan Kiszka
2008-10-14 9:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/13] Switch self-modified code recompilation to next_cflags Jan Kiszka
2008-10-14 9:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/13] Restore pc on watchpoint hits Jan Kiszka
2008-10-14 9:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/13] Remove premature memop TB terminations Jan Kiszka
2008-10-14 9:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/13] qemu: gdbstub: manage CPUs as threads Jan Kiszka
2008-10-14 9:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/13] Introduce BP_WATCHPOINT_HIT flag Jan Kiszka
2008-10-14 9:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 11/13] Add debug exception hook Jan Kiszka
2008-10-14 9:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 12/13] Introduce BP_CPU as a breakpoint type Jan Kiszka
2008-10-14 9:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 13/13] x86: Debug register emulation Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48F4E45F.1060300@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).