From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KsHLT-0006RN-Q1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:32:23 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KsHLO-0006Po-NE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:32:22 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33380 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KsHLO-0006Pl-IF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:32:18 -0400
Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.147]:2800)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1KsHLO-0000AC-4D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:32:18 -0400
Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so684608qwc.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 06:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <48FDD9DD.4010906@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:32:13 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] release date of qemu 0.9.2?
References: <BAY110-DAV368495AFEC122115C5BA7B92E0@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BAY110-DAV368495AFEC122115C5BA7B92E0@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

C.W. Betts wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> When will qemu be given the status of 0.9.2?  I was browsing the 
> source code of the Qemu that ships with OpenSuSE and noticed that 
> there are a lot of patches.  It would probably be helpful if there was 
> a release that didn't depend on GCC 4.
>
> Also, what targets still depend on dyngen?  And is anyone working on 
> porting them to TCG?

A lot of previously supported hosts are no longer supported with TCG.  I 
would think adding those hosts would be more important than completing 
the TCG conversion before cutting a new release.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
> Comment: Macs Rule\!
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkj9WHAACgkQIXkdd5hN+dt1FACfQoHQDQbRCMSCD0gzR7ODpywl
> iucAnjjSdBhMbwvzCuG536U7ikRlV6QJ
> =+urm
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
>