From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: farman@linux.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
schnelle@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
richard.henderson@linaro.org, thuth@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
david@redhat.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] s390x/pci: enable adapter event notification for interpreted devices
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 16:10:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48b4014f-9a8b-be96-4abf-c9b7d8975386@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220114203849.243657-7-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
On 1/14/22 21:38, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> Use the associated vfio feature ioctl to enable adapter event notification
> and forwarding for devices when requested. This feature will be set up
> with or without firmware assist based upon the 'intassist' setting.
It is a personal opinion but I do not like the term 'intassist'.
Why not using 'gisa' ?
I would find it more relevant.
If something for the profane admin then interrupt_assist or irq_assist
or even int_assist.
Or is it forwarding_assist ?
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 24 ++++++++--
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h | 1 +
> include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.h | 20 ++++++++
> 5 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> index 66649af6e0..6ee70446ca 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> @@ -189,7 +189,10 @@ void s390_pci_sclp_deconfigure(SCCB *sccb)
> rc = SCLP_RC_NO_ACTION_REQUIRED;
> break;
> default:
> - if (pbdev->summary_ind) {
> + if (pbdev->interp) {
> + /* Interpreted devices were using interrupt forwarding */
> + s390_pci_set_aif(pbdev, NULL, false, pbdev->intassist);
> + } else if (pbdev->summary_ind) {
> pci_dereg_irqs(pbdev);
> }
> if (pbdev->iommu->enabled) {
> @@ -981,6 +984,11 @@ static int s390_pci_interp_plug(S390pciState *s, S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev)
> return rc;
> }
>
> + rc = s390_pci_probe_aif(pbdev);
> + if (rc) {
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> rc = s390_pci_update_passthrough_fh(pbdev);
> if (rc) {
> return rc;
> @@ -1076,6 +1084,7 @@ static void s390_pcihost_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
> if (pbdev->interp && !s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_ZPCI_INTERP)) {
> DPRINTF("zPCI interpretation facilities missing.\n");
> pbdev->interp = false;
> + pbdev->intassist = false;
> }
> if (pbdev->interp) {
> rc = s390_pci_interp_plug(s, pbdev);
> @@ -1090,11 +1099,13 @@ static void s390_pcihost_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
> if (!pbdev->interp) {
> /* Do vfio passthrough but intercept for I/O */
> pbdev->fh |= FH_SHM_VFIO;
> + pbdev->intassist = false;
> }
> } else {
> pbdev->fh |= FH_SHM_EMUL;
> /* Always intercept emulated devices */
> pbdev->interp = false;
> + pbdev->intassist = false;
> }
>
> if (s390_pci_msix_init(pbdev) && !pbdev->interp) {
> @@ -1244,7 +1255,10 @@ static void s390_pcihost_reset(DeviceState *dev)
> /* Process all pending unplug requests */
> QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(pbdev, &s->zpci_devs, link, next) {
> if (pbdev->unplug_requested) {
> - if (pbdev->summary_ind) {
> + if (pbdev->interp) {
> + /* Interpreted devices were using interrupt forwarding */
> + s390_pci_set_aif(pbdev, NULL, false, pbdev->intassist);
> + } else if (pbdev->summary_ind) {
> pci_dereg_irqs(pbdev);
> }
> if (pbdev->iommu->enabled) {
> @@ -1382,7 +1396,10 @@ static void s390_pci_device_reset(DeviceState *dev)
> break;
> }
>
> - if (pbdev->summary_ind) {
> + if (pbdev->interp) {
> + /* Interpreted devices were using interrupt forwarding */
> + s390_pci_set_aif(pbdev, NULL, false, pbdev->intassist);
> + } else if (pbdev->summary_ind) {
> pci_dereg_irqs(pbdev);
> }
> if (pbdev->iommu->enabled) {
> @@ -1428,6 +1445,7 @@ static Property s390_pci_device_properties[] = {
> DEFINE_PROP_S390_PCI_FID("fid", S390PCIBusDevice, fid),
> DEFINE_PROP_STRING("target", S390PCIBusDevice, target),
> DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("interp", S390PCIBusDevice, interp, true),
> + DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("intassist", S390PCIBusDevice, intassist, true),
We allow to disable IRQ forwarding only for test or debug purpose don't we?
Then shouldn't we make it explicit ?
> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> };
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
> index e9a0dc12e4..121e07cc41 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
> @@ -1111,6 +1111,46 @@ static void fmb_update(void *opaque)
> timer_mod(pbdev->fmb_timer, t + pbdev->pci_group->zpci_group.mui);
> }
>
> +static int mpcifc_reg_int_interp(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, ZpciFib *fib)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + /* Interpreted devices must also use interrupt forwarding */
> + rc = s390_pci_get_aif(pbdev, false, pbdev->intassist);
> + if (rc) {
> + DPRINTF("Bad interrupt forwarding state\n");
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + rc = s390_pci_set_aif(pbdev, fib, true, pbdev->intassist);
> + if (rc) {
> + DPRINTF("Failed to enable interrupt forwarding\n");
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mpcifc_dereg_int_interp(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, ZpciFib *fib)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + /* Interpreted devices were using interrupt forwarding */
> + rc = s390_pci_get_aif(pbdev, true, pbdev->intassist);
> + if (rc) {
> + DPRINTF("Bad interrupt forwarding state\n");
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + rc = s390_pci_set_aif(pbdev, fib, false, pbdev->intassist);
> + if (rc) {
> + DPRINTF("Failed to disable interrupt forwarding\n");
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int mpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint64_t fiba, uint8_t ar,
> uintptr_t ra)
> {
> @@ -1165,7 +1205,12 @@ int mpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint64_t fiba, uint8_t ar,
>
> switch (oc) {
> case ZPCI_MOD_FC_REG_INT:
> - if (pbdev->summary_ind) {
> + if (pbdev->interp) {
> + if (mpcifc_reg_int_interp(pbdev, &fib)) {
> + cc = ZPCI_PCI_LS_ERR;
> + s390_set_status_code(env, r1, ZPCI_MOD_ST_SEQUENCE);
> + }
> + } else if (pbdev->summary_ind) {
> cc = ZPCI_PCI_LS_ERR;
> s390_set_status_code(env, r1, ZPCI_MOD_ST_SEQUENCE);
> } else if (reg_irqs(env, pbdev, fib)) {
> @@ -1174,7 +1219,12 @@ int mpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint64_t fiba, uint8_t ar,
> }
> break;
> case ZPCI_MOD_FC_DEREG_INT:
> - if (!pbdev->summary_ind) {
> + if (pbdev->interp) {
> + if (mpcifc_dereg_int_interp(pbdev, &fib)) {
> + cc = ZPCI_PCI_LS_ERR;
> + s390_set_status_code(env, r1, ZPCI_MOD_ST_SEQUENCE);
> + }
> + } else if (!pbdev->summary_ind) {
> cc = ZPCI_PCI_LS_ERR;
> s390_set_status_code(env, r1, ZPCI_MOD_ST_SEQUENCE);
> } else {
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c
> index 2cab3a9e89..73f3b3ed19 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c
> @@ -149,6 +149,85 @@ int s390_pci_update_passthrough_fh(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int s390_pci_probe_aif(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev)
> +{
> + VFIOPCIDevice *vdev = VFIO_PCI(pbdev->pdev);
> + struct vfio_device_feature feat = {
> + .argsz = sizeof(struct vfio_device_feature),
> + .flags = VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_PROBE + VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_ZPCI_AIF
> + };
> +
> + return ioctl(vdev->vbasedev.fd, VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE, &feat);
> +}
> +
> +int s390_pci_set_aif(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, ZpciFib *fib, bool enable,
> + bool assist)
> +{
> + VFIOPCIDevice *vdev = VFIO_PCI(pbdev->pdev);
> + struct vfio_device_zpci_aif *data;
> + int size = sizeof(struct vfio_device_feature) + sizeof(*data);
> + g_autofree struct vfio_device_feature *feat = g_malloc0(size);
> +
> + feat->argsz = size;
> + feat->flags = VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_SET + VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_ZPCI_AIF;
> +
> + data = (struct vfio_device_zpci_aif *)&feat->data;
> + if (enable) {
> + data->flags = VFIO_DEVICE_ZPCI_FLAG_AIF_FLOAT;
> + if (!pbdev->intassist) {
> + data->flags |= VFIO_DEVICE_ZPCI_FLAG_AIF_HOST;
> + }
> + /* Fill in the guest fib info */
> + data->ibv = fib->aibv;
> + data->sb = fib->aisb;
> + data->noi = FIB_DATA_NOI(fib->data);
> + data->isc = FIB_DATA_ISC(fib->data);
> + data->sbo = FIB_DATA_AISBO(fib->data);
> + } else {
> + data->flags = 0;
> + }
> +
> + return ioctl(vdev->vbasedev.fd, VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE, feat);
> +}
> +
> +int s390_pci_get_aif(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, bool enable, bool assist)
> +{
> + VFIOPCIDevice *vdev = VFIO_PCI(pbdev->pdev);
> + struct vfio_device_zpci_aif *data;
> + int size = sizeof(struct vfio_device_feature) + sizeof(*data);
> + g_autofree struct vfio_device_feature *feat = g_malloc0(size);
> + int rc;
> +
> + feat->argsz = size;
> + feat->flags = VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_GET + VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_ZPCI_AIF;
> +
> + rc = ioctl(vdev->vbasedev.fd, VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE, feat);
> + if (rc) {
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + /* Determine if current interrupt settings match the host */
> + data = (struct vfio_device_zpci_aif *)&feat->data;
> + if (enable && (!(data->flags & VFIO_DEVICE_ZPCI_FLAG_AIF_FLOAT))) {
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> + } else if (!enable && (data->flags & VFIO_DEVICE_ZPCI_FLAG_AIF_FLOAT)) {
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * When enabled for interrupts, the assist and forced host-delivery are
> + * mututally exclusive
> + */
assist is unclear for me int_assist , forwarding_assist ?
> + if (enable && assist && (data->flags & VFIO_DEVICE_ZPCI_FLAG_AIF_HOST)) {
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> + } else if (enable && (!assist) && (!(data->flags &
> + VFIO_DEVICE_ZPCI_FLAG_AIF_HOST))) {
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> static void s390_pci_read_base(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev,
> struct vfio_device_info *info)
> {
> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h b/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h
> index a9843dfe97..9941ca0084 100644
> --- a/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h
> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h
> @@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ struct S390PCIBusDevice {
> bool pci_unplug_request_processed;
> bool unplug_requested;
> bool interp;
> + bool intassist;
> QTAILQ_ENTRY(S390PCIBusDevice) link;
> };
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.h b/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.h
> index 42533e38f7..6cec38a863 100644
> --- a/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.h
> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #define HW_S390_PCI_VFIO_H
>
> #include "hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h"
> +#include "hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h"
> #include CONFIG_DEVICES
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_VFIO
> @@ -23,6 +24,11 @@ void s390_pci_end_dma_count(S390pciState *s, S390PCIDMACount *cnt);
> int s390_pci_probe_interp(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev);
> int s390_pci_set_interp(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, bool enable);
> int s390_pci_update_passthrough_fh(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev);
> +int s390_pci_probe_aif(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev);
> +int s390_pci_set_aif(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, ZpciFib *fib, bool enable,
> + bool assist);
> +int s390_pci_get_aif(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, bool enable, bool assist);
> +
> void s390_pci_get_clp_info(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev);
> #else
> static inline bool s390_pci_update_dma_avail(int fd, unsigned int *avail)
> @@ -48,6 +54,20 @@ static inline int s390_pci_update_passthrough_fh(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev)
> {
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> +static inline int s390_pci_probe_aif(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +static inline int s390_pci_set_aif(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, ZpciFib *fib,
> + bool enable, bool assist)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +static inline int s390_pci_get_aif(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, bool enable,
> + bool assist)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> static inline void s390_pci_get_clp_info(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev) { }
> #endif
>
>
apart of the naming (which may be a personal taste) LGTM
--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-31 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-14 20:38 [PATCH v2 0/9] s390x/pci: zPCI interpretation support Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] Update linux headers Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] target/s390x: add zpci-interp to cpu models Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] fixup: force interp off for QEMU machine 6.2 and older Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 21:04 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] s390x/pci: enable for load/store intepretation Matthew Rosato
2022-01-17 14:51 ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-18 18:08 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-17 15:38 ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-18 18:14 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-31 9:37 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-31 14:46 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-31 17:11 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] s390x/pci: don't fence interpreted devices without MSI-X Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] s390x/pci: enable adapter event notification for interpreted devices Matthew Rosato
2022-01-31 15:10 ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2022-01-31 17:08 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] s390x/pci: use I/O Address Translation assist when interpreting Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] s390x/pci: use dtsm provided from vfio capabilities for interpreted devices Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] s390x/pci: let intercept devices have separate PCI groups Matthew Rosato
2022-01-17 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] s390x/pci: zPCI interpretation support Thomas Huth
2022-01-18 18:32 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-02-04 12:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48b4014f-9a8b-be96-4abf-c9b7d8975386@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).