From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kt0iG-0003tt-76 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:58:56 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kt0iF-0003rr-0S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:58:55 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60963 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kt0iE-0003rb-H0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:58:54 -0400 Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.146]:51501) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kt0iD-0001rU-Lj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:58:53 -0400 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9NE1a62030713 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:01:36 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id m9NDwofh092664 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:58:50 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m9NDwn3q004660 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:58:50 -0400 Message-ID: <49008318.6050408@us.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:58:48 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1224771556-11146-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1224771556-11146-7-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1224771556-11146-7-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 06/32] split kqemu_init into two Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Glauber Costa Cc: jan.kiszka@siemens.com, jes@sgi.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, avi@qumranet.com, Glauber Costa , dmitry.baryshkov@siemens.com Glauber Costa wrote: > From: Glauber Costa > > we separate kqemu_init() into a part that depends on env, > and other that does not. The later can be initialized earlier > This patch seems harmless but I can't reasonably infer why this change is necessary. What's the advantage of splitting the initialization into two parts? Regards, Anthony Liguori