From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KuSeU-0004QG-VL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:01:02 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KuSeT-0004PX-7R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:01:02 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54698 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KuSeS-0004PP-KH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:01:01 -0400
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.238]:14024)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1KuSeS-0002wt-C4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:01:00 -0400
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c46so584376wra.18
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4905C997.5060801@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:00:55 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Preliminary patch to implement ehci
References: <E1KqsdV-0000r9-5B@monty-python.gnu.org>	<11d301c93090$7e06d290$7a1477b0$@com>
	<010f01c93810$47ccb500$d7661f00$@com>
In-Reply-To: <010f01c93810$47ccb500$d7661f00$@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Mark Burkley wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Just checking, did anyone get a chance to look at this?
>
> Any suggestions for next steps?  Should I post a patch against trunk?
>   

Submitting the patch against 0.9.1 is a non-starter.  0.9.1 is at least 
a year old and the USB code has been majorly refactored.  If you want 
people to review it, it has to be against trunk.

Also make sure that you include a [PATCH] in your subject.  Otherwise, 
it's easily missed on the list.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>