From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [5578] Increase default IO timeout from 10ms to 5s
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 10:29:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <491007FD.3020704@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <490F723E.7070308@web.de>
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> There is a race between the alarm_timer firing SIGALRM and
> main_loop_wait reaching the safe harbor of select (with that infamous 5
> second timeout). If the signal comes when already blocked in select, it
> will properly resume the latter immediately. But if the timer fired
> BEFORE that point, host_alarm_handler will only set a flag that the host
> timer has fired, the actual rearming will be done AFTER return from
> select. Ooops....
>
> So, select should actually include the host timer as event. timerfd?
> Unfortunately a recent Linux-only feature :-/. I don't think we can
> rearm the timer from within the signal handler, at least not without
> running all the pending qemu timers. And that is surely not a signal
> handler job (qemu timer handler aren't thread-safe in general).
>
> Anyone any ideas? /me is thinking a bit more about it as well.
>
pselect():
1. run tcg code
2. block signals
3. pselect (enabling signals)
4. process pselect results (signals disabled again)
5. unblock signals
6. goto 1
Prior to Linux 2.6.16, pselect() was racy since it was implemented in
userspace rather than the kernel. I don't think it's a problem now.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-04 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-31 18:40 [Qemu-devel] [5578] Increase default IO timeout from 10ms to 5s Anthony Liguori
2008-10-31 18:52 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-11-02 19:08 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2008-11-03 20:04 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-11-03 20:36 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-11-03 21:50 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-11-03 22:00 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-11-03 22:03 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-11-04 8:07 ` andrzej zaborowski
2008-11-04 8:22 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-11-04 8:33 ` andrzej zaborowski
2008-11-04 11:32 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-11-04 16:22 ` M. Warner Losh
2008-11-04 17:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-11-04 17:55 ` M. Warner Losh
2008-11-04 19:08 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-11-05 15:00 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-11-05 16:10 ` M. Warner Losh
2008-11-05 18:21 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-11-05 18:41 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2008-11-05 20:16 ` andrzej zaborowski
2008-11-05 20:28 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2008-11-05 23:38 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-11-06 0:53 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-11-06 5:19 ` M. Warner Losh
2008-11-04 8:29 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-10-31 19:41 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jamie Lokier
2008-10-31 20:13 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=491007FD.3020704@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).