From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KxRdS-0004vk-9i
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:32:18 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KxRdO-0004uK-SJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:32:17 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50526 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KxRdN-0004u6-UW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:32:14 -0500
Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.158]:14656)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1KxRdN-0003My-Uf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:32:14 -0500
Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 6so1158744ywa.82
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 11:32:10 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4910A336.908@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:32:06 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: When should I use qemu_ram_alloc(), and how?
References: <490D0C8F.9010601@juno.dti.ne.jp>	<f43fc5580811012352k67091dd3oe56c42a150fe4398@mail.gmail.com>	<200811041527.mA4FRPo2005575@smtp12.dti.ne.jp>
	<f43fc5580811041114v3ff74305md4a287d67f3cc13e@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f43fc5580811041114v3ff74305md4a287d67f3cc13e@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "takasi-y@ops.dti.ne.jp" <takasi-y@ops.dti.ne.jp>

Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 11/4/08, takasi-y@ops.dti.ne.jp <takasi-y@ops.dti.ne.jp> wrote:
>   
>
>>  -    pci_register_io_region((PCIDevice *)d, 0, 0x2000000,
>>  +    pci_register_io_region((PCIDevice *)d, 0, vga_ram_size,

No, I think this is wrong.  The PCI IO region is independent of 
vga_ram_size.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori