From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KxlK9-00087v-L3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:33:41 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KxlK8-000875-29 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:33:41 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46958 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KxlK7-00086y-Mm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:33:39 -0500 Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.78.148]:53397) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KxlK7-0000ZX-BA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:33:39 -0500 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so36437eyk.4 for ; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 08:33:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4911CADD.7090904@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 10:33:33 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND][PATCH 0/3] Fix guest time drift under heavy load. References: <20081029152236.14831.15193.stgit@dhcp-1-237.local> <490B59BF.3000205@codemonkey.ws> <20081102130441.GD16809@redhat.com> <49119551.2070704@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: dlaor@redhat.com, Gleb Natapov andrzej zaborowski wrote: > 2008/11/5 Dor Laor : > > I don't, as far as I understand it's a -win2k-hack type of addition, > Yes, I agree. It is definitely not something we want enabled in all circumstances. But before we get to how to conditionally enable it, I want to know exactly what circumstances it helps and by how much. Regards, Anthony Liguori