From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KzxLT-0000vn-7Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:48:07 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KzxLR-0000vT-3y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:48:06 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38975 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KzxLQ-0000vQ-Ve for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:48:05 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:52591) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KzxLQ-000096-Ei for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:48:04 -0500 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mABHm2UL007549 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:48:03 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mABHm2UX015433 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:48:02 -0500 Received: from zweiblum.travel.kraxel.org (vpn-4-149.str.redhat.com [10.32.4.149]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mABHm11R009725 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:48:01 -0500 Message-ID: <4919C550.5020609@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:48:00 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] Fix block I/O hang. References: <4919B46C.3040804@redhat.com> <4919B79A.5030402@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4919B79A.5030402@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Anthony Liguori wrote: > Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> $subject says all. >> >> please apply, >> Gerd > > Under what circumstances? posix_aio_read() is only invoked from a > select callback. This means there should be data available to be read. Hmm, looked at the loop again a bit closer. First, the check for errno == EAGAIN is superfluous when the filehandle isn't in non-blocking mode. It will not happen. Second, the check for errno == EINTR is superfluous too because the loop will retry the read() syscall anyway for *any* error. Third, when called from a select callback it shouldn't block indeed. It does though for me now and then when booting xen guests (with a big stack of xenner patches). Doesn't reproduce reliable though. Sprinkled in a printk (with rfd being non-blocking) and got a EAGAIN once, so it got called with rfd not having data. cheers, Gerd