From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1L0ixs-0002gW-2r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:38:56 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1L0ixn-0002fg-Gh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:38:54 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43283 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L0ixn-0002fT-4s
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:38:51 -0500
Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.150]:39458)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1L0ixm-0004fu-IK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:38:50 -0500
Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so838444qwc.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:38:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <491C9056.6090005@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:38:46 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/12] Enhance debugging support - 4th take
References: <20081103103558.213902776@mchn012c.ww002.siemens.net>
In-Reply-To: <20081103103558.213902776@mchn012c.ww002.siemens.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>

Hi Jan,

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Yet another round for the gdbstub and debug regs patches.
>   

First, thanks for your patience with this series.  Unfortunately, there 
isn't a very clear target-i386 maintainer right now so this series 
hasn't gotten the feedback it should have gotten.  I feel a little 
uneasy about committing it because I don't have complete confidence in 
the impact with TCG but after reviewing it and I don't have a setup 
prepared to reliably test it all, I feel pretty certain that it's not 
going to blow things up.

I have some minor comments for some of the patches.  Once you address 
them, I'll apply the series unless there is objection before you post 
the next round.

In terms of my exec.c split, I'll wait to commit the code motion until 
after your series has been merged to keep rebasing easy for you.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori