From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50666) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctGru-0002u9-TP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:54:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctGrp-0001Px-Ur for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:54:46 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41960) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctGrp-0001Oi-PR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:54:41 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6FF3437F77 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:54:40 +0000 (UTC) References: <3d1c16a1-ec05-0367-e569-64a63b34f2e3@redhat.com> <4a56f716-3528-ddd4-f8c4-f3f6b23c469a@redhat.com> <3044459b-65a3-ca78-c009-15de9823704a@redhat.com> <20170329164646.GD2501@work-vm> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <492932b1-e317-0cd9-5eb5-9e49f6c0b1ba@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:54:34 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170329164646.GD2501@work-vm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Deprecating old machine types List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, John Snow , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paolo Bonzini , Juan Quintela On 29.03.2017 18:46, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > * Thomas Huth (thuth@redhat.com) wrote: >> On 27.03.2017 21:04, John Snow wrote: >>> >>> On 03/27/2017 04:06 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: >>>> On 24.03.2017 23:10, John Snow wrote: >> [...] >>>>> I have a list of things I want to axe... >>>> >>>> I've started a Wiki page with such a list here: >>>> >>>> http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Features/LegacyRemoval >>>> >>>> Feel free to amend! >>> >>> Absolutely! >> >> By the way, what about old machine types like "pc-0.10" ? Do we want to >> carry them along forever (e.g. since it is not too complicated to >> maintain?), or shall we get rid of those one day (e.g. with QEMU 3.0), too? > > It seems reasonable to slowly deprecate them. > I'm just not sure how slowly. We could maybe at least start with "pc-0.10", and maybe also "pc-0.11" ... if nobody complains afterwards, we can get rid of the other pc-0.x machines later with QEMU 4.0 (or so). Thomas