From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LAKp1-0000ye-4c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:53:31 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LAKp0-0000yS-JK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:53:30 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49226 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LAKp0-0000yP-F3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:53:30 -0500
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:47470)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1LAKoz-0004F9-Ui
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:53:30 -0500
Message-ID: <493F8382.1020806@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:53:22 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <1228820143-23580-1-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
	<493E896F.2030209@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <493E896F.2030209@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add nic link up/down emulation to e1000
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>

Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>         Here's a small patch set which adds link up/down
>> emulation to e1000 via a "set_link" monitor command. This is
>> useful for people who want to e.g. test how applications
>> and/or the guest OS handles this condition.
>>
>>         The command itself takes a VLAN ID and device index
>> in order to identify which device to modify. That's a bit
>> lame and could clearly by improved if the overall idea was
>> thought to be sound.
>>   
>
> Yeah, this series looks good (as does the virtio-net one).  I plan on 
> merging virtio-net either today or tomorrow and I can merge your 
> virtio-net series into QEMU too. 

Excellent.  Mark, I'll get your patches from the next qemu merge.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function