From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LAnbG-0002TE-Pl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:37:14 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LAnbG-0002SH-C9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:37:14 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57592 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LAnbF-0002S9-Vj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:37:13 -0500 Received: from smtp.ctxuk.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:8132 helo=SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LAnbF-0002lK-HP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:37:13 -0500 Message-ID: <494133A8.9010607@eu.citrix.com> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:37:12 +0000 From: Stefano Stabellini MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0 of 7] [UPDATE] DisplayState interface change References: <492D8B94.4000805@eu.citrix.com> <200812111239.41509.paul@codesourcery.com> <49413024.5020106@eu.citrix.com> <200812111529.26089.paul@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200812111529.26089.paul@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Paul Brook wrote: > On Thursday 11 December 2008, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> Paul Brook wrote: >>>> void qemu_console_resize(DisplayState *ds, int width, int height, int >>>> bpp, int linesize, uint8_t *data) >>>> { >>>> TextConsole *s = get_graphic_console(); >>>> s->g_width = width; >>>> s->g_height = height; >>>> if (is_graphic_console()) { >>>> if (data && (bpp == 16 || bpp == 32)) { >>>> qemu_freeDisplaySurface(ds->surface); >>>> ds->surface = qemu_createDisplaySurfaceFrom(width, height, >>>> bpp, linesize, data); } else { >>>> ds->surface = qemu_resizeDisplaySurface(ds->surface, width, >>>> height, 32, 4 * width); } >>>> dpy_resize(ds); >>>> } >>>> } >>> It feels wrong to be modifying the surface here. We already have to >>> recreate the surface when we switch consoles, so why can't we use the >>> same code for a resize? >> We use mostly the same code already. > > Why only mostly? > > IIUC if a console is resized while active you get different behavior to a > console that is resized when inactive, then activated. This is wrong. > Are we arguing about where to put two lines of code? I can use the same function for both even if the code is already the same.