From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LAu8L-0006aW-0G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:35:49 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LAu8J-0006ZW-72 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:35:48 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42448 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LAu8J-0006ZS-3J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:35:47 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:48067) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LAu8I-0004Ge-If for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:35:46 -0500 Message-ID: <494195AD.1020901@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:35:25 -0800 From: Max Krasnyansky MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu/KVM ehci support References: <1295ed070811220528m3fb93b5evb19de8a855aad62c@mail.gmail.com> <492B531F.3030200@qualcomm.com> <4941615A.7030800@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Mark Burkley Cc: Pantelis Koukousoulas , Mark Burkley , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Mark Burkley wrote: > On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:52:10 -0800, you wrote: > >> Hi Mark, >> >> Mark Burkley wrote: >>> On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:21:35 -0800, MaxK wrote: >>>> Mark, I'm planning on playing with it some more later today. If you have >>>> an updated version please send me a patch or a GIT tree to pull from. >>>> My first attempt as you remember was not very successful (ie XP was just >>>> crashing). >>> I never did find out why that was happening but I will update the >>> patch against trunk and retest today to see if I can duplicate the >>> problem. >> Do you have an updated patch ? > > I got tangled up trying to install git and get a hole poked in the > firewall then had to go firefighting. Apologies again, I'll try to > follow up on the status tomorrow. git port should be open on our > server but I will have to check. Sounds good. >> btw I noticed a FIXME in the code that said that host device handoff is >> not supported yet (or something along those lines). Does that mean that >> we cannot yet use Linux host devices with EHCI ? >> Also how did you test EHCI in general ? 'info ehci' monitor command is >> commented out and if I try to un-comment/call it qemu dies. > > That's probably why it is commented out - I didn't get around to > merging the info command. > > I tested primarily using mass storage devices. It used to work with > mice and printers too but I haven't tested those lately. Basically > any device that uses bulk and/or interrupt but not isochronous should > work. > > The handoff refers to the handoff from EHCI to UHCI if a device is > USB1.1. At the moment EHCI handles all devices whether they are 1.1 > or 2.0 though this isn't actually an issue due to backward > compatibility. Got it. As soon as you send an update I'll give it a shoot again with the devices I have. Thanx Max