From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LBDLu-0005eM-J6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:07:06 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LBDLs-0005dJ-Vc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:07:06 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33222 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LBDLs-0005d8-QJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:07:04 -0500
Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.156]:30386)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1LBDLr-0007eq-N6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:07:03 -0500
Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 6so733551ywa.82
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:07:00 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4942B650.20609@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:06:56 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5d932ac0ac8940b042c1.1229105803@duo.random>
In-Reply-To: <5d932ac0ac8940b042c1.1229105803@duo.random>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 5] fix cpu_physical_memory len
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: chrisw@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
>
> Be consistent and have length be size_t for all methods.
>   

ram_addr_t would be better than size_t here.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori