From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LCcby-0003G7-FV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:17:30 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LCcbw-0003EG-I7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:17:29 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59930 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LCcbw-0003E8-CN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:17:28 -0500 Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.148]:50905) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LCcbw-0003tk-3i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:17:28 -0500 Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so773964qwc.4 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:17:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4947D48D.8010203@codemonkey.ws> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:17:17 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [6064] Implement device tree support needed for Bamboo emulation References: <200812161230.24052.paul@codesourcery.com> <1229440187.31337.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1229440187.31337.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Paul Brook , Aurelien Jarno Hollis Blanchard wrote: > If you'd prefer to make libfdt mandatory, I'm fine with that. > No, it shouldn't be mandatory :-) >>> This patch introduces a dependency on libfdt for flat device tree support. >>> >> I don't like the way this is done. >> >> AFAIK libfdt isn't present in any of the major distros. I thought the >> conclusion was that we should import libfdt into qemu. >> > > That was our conclusion, but Anthony never agreed. > Because it's better to let the distros maintain this. That way, they can deal with security issues, etc. > FWIW, I have requested that Fedora and Debian package libfdt, and they > agreed in principle, but it's still missing in Fedora 10 for example. > As long as it's heading toward distros, it should be fine. If we decide to use libfdt for core QEMU functionality (like config file), we should revisit this though. Regards, Anthony Liguori