From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LCxsq-00030H-Az for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:00:20 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LCxso-0002zO-Cd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:00:18 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45575 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LCxsn-0002zF-El for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:00:17 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:33658) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LCxsn-0003Wk-0U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:00:17 -0500 Received: from Relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E59469E3 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:00:14 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <49491519.4080907@suse.de> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:04:57 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Add BIOS splash image support References: <1229440810-12394-1-git-send-email-Laurent.Vivier@bull.net> <49480F6D.2010302@codemonkey.ws> <20081217110319.GD13455@redhat.com> <200812171318.58650.paul@codesourcery.com> <49490282.3080800@siemens.com> <4949116F.6090604@redhat.com> <49491293.9070501@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <49491293.9070501@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Jan Kiszka schrieb: > Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> Yes, please. I hate this artificial delay, specifically as I have to do >>> a lot of short boot tests where this contributes noticeably to their >>> execution time. But, as usual, it didn't hurt enough to make me hack a >>> patch yet. I'm willing to do this if we can agree on how it should be done. >> Show the boot menu only on case no "-boot whatever" cmd line option is >> present? > > I would say only when there is -bootmenu as Gleb suggested. I'm half > done with this approach already. I like Gerd's approach better as it doesn't introduce yet another command line parameter. It makes sense to me that you don't want a menu if you specify -boot. Kevin