From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LDi8d-0003Dx-3o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:23:43 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LDi8c-0003Db-5e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:23:42 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51369 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LDi8c-0003DX-2W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:23:42 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f21.google.com ([209.85.219.21]:55275) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LDi8b-0002JE-Qb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:23:41 -0500 Received: by ewy14 with SMTP id 14so1207894ewy.10 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:23:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <494BCA88.5000503@codemonkey.ws> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:23:36 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Guest testing with HPET emulation Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Right now, it looks like older Linux guests don't work well with the HPET. We'll be debugging this over the new few weeks but in my testing, -no-hpet works as a work around. If anyone encounters other guests that work with -no-hpet, please let me know. Regards, Anthony Liguori