From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] hook cpu running at a higher level.
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:54:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <495A282D.20809@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18777.63215.125693.799799@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Ian Jackson wrote:
> The Xen qemu process runs only in one thread which is fine because it
> doesn't need to be involved with actual processor execution. In
> theory parallel execution (in different threads and thus on different
> physical cpus) of IO emulations requested by different guest vcpus
> might make some small performance difference but I doubt it would be
> worth our while. So I think the Xen setup will still from qemu's
> point of view look like a single vcpu no matter how many vcpus the
> guest aactually has.
>
I thing it makes sense for you to have multiple vcpus -- that is
multiple CPUState objects. You can still have just one thread (which
would be the iothread in kvm's terminology).
So:
tcg - multiplexes all vcpus and io on one thread
kvm - iothread + per-vcpu thread
xen - iothread, vcpus scheduled by hypervisor
tcg also ought to move to an iothread model, so it can take advantage of
multicore for things like display updates. For x86-on-x86, it may even
be possible to have vcpus running in parallel (with some kind of
shared/exclusive lock on softmmu).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-30 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-29 18:29 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hook cpu running at a higher level Glauber Costa
2008-12-30 10:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Ian Jackson
2008-12-30 10:44 ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-30 13:45 ` Ian Jackson
2008-12-30 11:35 ` Glauber Costa
2008-12-30 17:25 ` Ian Jackson
2008-12-30 13:54 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-12-30 14:44 ` Ian Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=495A282D.20809@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).