From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LKcbO-0005If-Ao for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:53:58 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LKcbL-0005IN-Ra for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:53:57 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50182 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LKcbL-0005IK-NJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:53:55 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f21.google.com ([209.85.219.21]:56403) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LKcbL-0006HZ-9R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:53:55 -0500 Received: by ewy14 with SMTP id 14so9732602ewy.10 for ; Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:53:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4964EC2B.1080406@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:53:47 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mark nic as trusted References: <20090107142626.GE3267@redhat.com> <4964D98B.6030404@codemonkey.ws> <20090107165050.GI3267@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20090107165050.GI3267@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 10:34:19AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> Gleb Natapov wrote: >> >>> This patch allows to mark specific nic as trusted by adding special >>> PCI capability. "Trusted" means that it is used for communication >>> between host and guest and no malicious entity can inject traffic >>> to the nic. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov >>> >>> >> What utility does this have? Does this make Windows happy in some >> special way? >> >> > That is for secure guest<->host communication over network. Guest has to > know somehow which link host uses for communication. If guest has no way > to know this, another computer on untrusted network can pretend it is real > host and "own" a guest. > So this is for vmchannel? How do you differentiate a real device with that bit set compared to the vmchannel device? Regards, Anthony Liguori > -- > Gleb. > > >