From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LL2du-00056x-Gp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:42:18 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LL2dt-000569-Gj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:42:18 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33066 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LL2dt-00055z-A1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:42:17 -0500 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.243]:46662) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LL2ds-0003RT-Us for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:42:17 -0500 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c38so3803315ana.37 for ; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:42:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <49667330.5070001@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:42:08 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mark nic as trusted References: <20090107142626.GE3267@redhat.com> <4964D98B.6030404@codemonkey.ws> <20090107165050.GI3267@redhat.com> <4964EC2B.1080406@codemonkey.ws> <4964EC55.4000507@codemonkey.ws> <20090107184103.GA19406@redhat.com> <496501CD.8060202@codemonkey.ws> <20090107194633.GB19406@redhat.com> <49665AE7.3000708@codemonkey.ws> <20090108212652.GB22504@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20090108212652.GB22504@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 01:58:31PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> > Windows and Linux allows access to PCI space, so it is easy to check > "trustedness". AFAIK we already have Windows code to do that. In Linux > it can be done even by shell script by examining files in /sys. > Are we going to have a standard way of doing this in Linux distros such that these nics are treated differently from other nics? Have we gotten the appropriate distro folks to agree to this? Regards, Anthony Liguori