From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LM45c-00011f-DP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:27:08 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LM45a-00011O-LQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:27:07 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57268 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LM45a-00011L-FV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:27:06 -0500
Received: from amistad.itbs.cz ([81.0.238.226]:34027)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <jakub@jermar.eu>) id 1LM45a-0000Ei-1k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:27:06 -0500
Message-ID: <496A2BE4.9040504@jermar.eu>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:27:00 +0100
From: Jakub Jermar <jakub@jermar.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [BUG] Possible bug in sparc64 emulation of SAVE/RESTORE
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: blauwirbel@gmail.com
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi,

I've just noticed that functions:

helper_save()
helper_restore()
cpu_cwp_inc()
cpu_cwp_dec

assume that CWP moves counter-clock-wise on sparc64.
I am pretty sure it moves clock-wise on sparc64
(contrary to the situation on sparc32).

Regards,
Jakub