From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LMjOL-0004Np-JY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:33:13 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LMjOK-0004NV-43 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:33:13 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34725 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LMjOJ-0004NO-Ug for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:33:11 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:43778 helo=mx1.suse.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LMjOJ-0004T0-I5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:33:11 -0500 Message-ID: <496C9813.7000609@suse.de> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:33:07 +0100 From: Alexander Graf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] virtio breakage with 2.6.25 guest kernel Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: kvm-devel Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, while I don't fully understand the problem, here's what I experience so far: When using an openSUSE 11.0 kernel (2.6.25) in the guest, virtio on tap breaks with current KVM git, while it used to work before (haven't bisected, definitely worked in kvm-78, but is probably due to Anthony's rewrite). It shows the following message (comes from qemu): virtio-net header not in first element This is because qemu expects a message with mergeable rx bufs (12 bytes), but if I see things correctly the old kernel doesn't support that feature (sends 10 bytes). I put in some debug messages on IO reads/writes in the qemu virtio handler and got these: virtio IO read: 0 = 0x100bba3 virtio IO write: 0x4 = 0x100bba3 virtio: setting features 0x100bba3 So I believe the feature masking is somewhat non-functional? Or did I read the masking code in qemu's virtio-net wrong? Basically for me, current KVM git broke old guest support, which is a clear regression and should not happen. Does anybody with more expertise in virtio want to take on this? Alex