From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LNaDx-0007y5-AB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:58:01 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LNaDv-0007xI-Lc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:58:00 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39166 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LNaDv-0007xD-Hc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:57:59 -0500 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]:36838) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LNaDv-0002KC-64 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:57:59 -0500 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n0FLuGtY009866 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:56:16 -0500 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id n0FLvugu188374 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:57:56 -0500 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n0FLvuRN029650 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:57:56 -0500 Message-ID: <496FB15C.3090806@us.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:57:48 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1231422848-32179-1-git-send-email-ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4966635E.8090205@us.ibm.com> <4966FDC1.7070705@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <4966FDC1.7070705@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] qemu: report issues causing the kvm probe to fail v3 Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christian Ehrhardt Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, avi@qumranet.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org >> > This applies to qemu upstream already when not specifying -p or -p 2 > (as I already tested yesterday before submission). > Well I removed the leading qemu dir manually and updated the -51 lines > offset (attached), should I change more than that (add the leading > trunk maybe, atm I'm just not sure what changes you want) ? Applied. Thanks. Regards, Anthony Liguori