From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LPNI5-00075b-Ac for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:33:41 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LPNI4-00074C-BC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:33:40 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42648 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LPNI4-00073y-2Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:33:40 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:38106) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LPNI3-0003wz-Iz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:33:39 -0500 Message-ID: <49763483.1050201@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:30:59 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Extremely slow graphic updates References: <20090119162633.GO29175@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <20090119194221.GS29175@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <20090120005351.GV29175@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <200901200133.25029.paul@codesourcery.com> <4975B3F6.6050706@eu.citrix.com> <20090120144518.GW29175@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <4975EC17.3090404@eu.citrix.com> <20090120165534.GY29175@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <20090120170933.GF5177@const.bordeaux.inria.fr> <20090120181533.GZ29175@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <4976151B.2000903@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <4976151B.2000903@eu.citrix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Paul Brook , Lennart Sorensen Stefano Stabellini wrote: > At risk of being silly, why don't you just use vnc to connect to qemu, > if qemu is running on a remote machine? > sdl over ssh is much easier to use than vnc. I use it extensively while testing. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.