From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Bypass tcg memory functions -v1.0-2009
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:26:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <497776C9.5050309@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200901210543.07538.paul@codesourcery.com>
Paul Brook wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 January 2009, Glauber Costa wrote:
>
>> This series is not very different from the last one that did it.
>> Just bringing it back from my vacations. Idea is to replace tcg
>> memory functions with kvm's, selectable at runtime. Right now
>> we use a conditional selection. In the future, we might use
>> function pointers to allow for easy coupling of any hypervisor.
>>
>
> I dislike that you're introducing two different ways or doing the same thing.
> Duplicating all the memory region tracking code seems like a bad way to solve
> this problem.
>
To me, this patch set is really about defining the memory API for QEMU's
CPU emulation/virtualization core. It can be made a lot prettier by
introducing function pointers and such but doing the separation and
having two implementations is the first step in that direction.
I believe this is the right level of abstraction. Trying to make shared
code with a lower level interface is much more complicated because TCG
has some need for deep hooks in the memory code. If TCG ever wants to
use memory slots instead of a tree, I'd rather see common code
abstracted into a set of libs than making the slot code the main code
with hooks for TCG.
A big part of the reason for these patches is to make it possible to
build QEMU without TCG in an architecturally clean way.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Paul
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-21 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-20 18:50 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Bypass tcg memory functions -v1.0-2009 Glauber Costa
2009-01-20 18:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] remove smaller slots if registering a bigger one Glauber Costa
2009-01-20 18:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] re-register whole area upon lfb unmap Glauber Costa
2009-01-20 18:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] isolate io handling routine Glauber Costa
2009-01-20 18:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] replace cpu_physical_memory_rw Glauber Costa
2009-01-20 18:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] hook cpu_register_physical_mem Glauber Costa
2009-01-20 18:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] cache slot lookup Glauber Costa
2009-01-20 20:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] replace cpu_physical_memory_rw Avi Kivity
2009-01-20 20:33 ` Glauber Costa
2009-01-21 5:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Bypass tcg memory functions -v1.0-2009 Paul Brook
2009-01-21 11:46 ` Glauber Costa
2009-01-21 17:16 ` Ian Jackson
2009-01-21 18:40 ` Glauber Costa
2009-01-22 0:11 ` Paul Brook
2009-01-22 14:02 ` Glauber Costa
2009-01-26 20:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-21 19:26 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=497776C9.5050309@us.ibm.com \
--to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).